﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Teradata Forums / Marketing Tips and CRM Best Practices / Teradata   / CRMIOS Tables and Journaling / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>Teradata Forums</description><link>http://www.teradata.com/teradataforum/</link><webMaster>info@teradata.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:34:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: CRMIOS Tables and Journaling</title><link>http://www.teradata.com/teradataforum/Topic7093-6-1.aspx</link><description>My DBAs asked the same question. After studying the space consumed for the tables that had the default FALLBACK and JOURNAL entries, the number of rows and actual space used was considered to be trivial.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:10:11 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>jrs</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: CRMIOS Tables and Journaling</title><link>http://www.teradata.com/teradataforum/Topic7093-6-1.aspx</link><description>What is your DBA's reasoning for during Fallback and Journaling off?</description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:44:21 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>cgard</dc:creator></item><item><title>CRMIOS Tables and Journaling</title><link>http://www.teradata.com/teradataforum/Topic7093-6-1.aspx</link><description>The DBA's would like to turn off Fallback and Journaling on tables in the CRMIOS Database. Specifically, IOS_ECAMP*, IOS_SCHD*, IOS_TBL* as well as others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since I came into this job when CRM was already up and going, I am assuming that these are system tables and they shipped as-is with Journaling turned on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is there a problem with letting the DBAs turnoff the Journaling on the CRM IOS tables?</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:46:23 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Robby</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>