﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Teradata Forums / Analytical Applications / Teradata   / ANSI vs. Teradata SQL / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>Teradata Forums</description><link>http://www.teradata.com/teradataforum/</link><webMaster>info@teradata.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:03:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: ANSI vs. Teradata SQL</title><link>http://www.teradata.com/teradataforum/Topic9728-5-1.aspx</link><description>The latest SQL standard, (SQL:2003, soon to be superseded by SQL:2008) is vast.  Teradata implements a very large subset (perhaps 95%) of the SQL:2003 Core language as defined by the standard, which is on a par with the other major RDBMS vendors.  At present, there isn't any public document that provides a concise summary of the outstanding differences between Teradata and the standard, but you can get detailed compliance information from the Teradata SQL Reference manual.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:09:06 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jim Chapman</dc:creator></item><item><title>ANSI vs. Teradata SQL</title><link>http://www.teradata.com/teradataforum/Topic9728-5-1.aspx</link><description>hello all,can any 1 help me with the differences between ANSI vs. Teradata SQLamy meterial which can help me out</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:02:47 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Rahul</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>